Just like Burning Abyss monsters, Falco would trigger if it were sent to the graveyard. It could then set any of the two trap cards, whichever might be in the graveyard.
However, if the opponent selected Falco to be added to the hand with Painful Choice, one could simply discard it to activate Foxy's effect. This would special summon Foxy and Falco would trigger nevertheless, again setting a trap card from the graveyard.
It becomes apparent that Painful Choice 's power has only increased instead of decreased over the years. Even in non-graveyard-reliant decks it would still be a skillful addition. However, the very presence of graveyard effects makes Painful Choice too easy to abuse. Personally, I do not see this card coming off the banlist in its current form. What are your thoughts on Painful Choice? Are there any other cards that you want me to discuss in a future article?
Please leave your thoughts and suggestions in the comments below! Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily Cardmarket. To leave your comment please log into your Cardmarket account or create a new account. An ""--Add that card to your hand and banish the remaining cards, face-down. You can only use 1 "Painful Choice" per turn"" errata should be enough to put it unlimited. Not a bad card, not an ultra broken card as the original, not an completly useless card as the post-errata Sinister Serpent.
Sigh- Cards that received an errata which became unplayable after their errata are definitely a problem. It often is hard to change a card's text without deviating too much from its original intended usage while still making it balanced at the same time.
Your suggestion is definitely an interesting way to change Painful Choice's text. I bet your version would be loved by Gren Maju players! Painful choice could come off the banlist. If it had an errata: You can not activate card effects for the next 3 turns. When foolish burial a card, that sends a single monster to the grave is limited to 1 and is one of the best cards ever. Yugioh is a game of synergy. So most of the power comes from other cards. In a world with only normal monsters of equal atk in deck.
Foolish burial would get you sooner into fatigue and would be useless. With the right synergies, even a card that shuffles a card from hand into the deck could be overpowered. Ash blossom may stop painful choices effect and negations might make it useless too, but painful choice in an era, where the graveyard content equals Ressources, is one of the cards that could never come back. Only draw spells like pot of greed, graceful charity and upstart are more powerful.
Shoul Painful Choice would definitely need an some kind of errata to come off the banlist. Another possible restriction might be "You cannot activate cards and effects of cards with the same name as the cards sent to the GY by this card's effect until the end of your next turn". Whatever the restriction would be, it would need to be a really hard restriction to make Painful Choice somewhat balanced.
Great article. The card got limited even before Sinister Serpent was released as it helped greatly in exodia which while very risky when spell ruler came out, could still be a decent deck if you were very lucky. User Info: AwesomeMario. People who think I'm Awesome: AwesomeMario posted And that spell card is also banned.
More topics from this board What is a good turbo deck combination? General 4 Answers Can someone show me a good elemental hero deck list? General 3 Answers What is the best strategy for 4 the perfect duel runner?
Build 1 Answer Anybody know how to make a good Vilon Omega deck? General 2 Answers. Ask A Question. Browse More Questions. Keep me logged in on this device. Forgot your username or password? User Info: frogzx frogzx 8 years ago 1 Why was he even hit in the first place? User Info: thecheese thecheese 8 years ago 7 He said "good" deck. Is this a good dark magician turbo dueling deck. Any ideas for a Modern day Dark Magician turbo dueling deck with speed world 2.
Too bad competitive play got in the way. Cyber Twin is clearly better. Your doing it wrong Your doing it so wrong you make me want to punch a baby.
A little confusion there. It worked reasonably but its not exactly competitive because its an OTK that takes up to 2 turns to perform hence not making it an OTK and I dont have any cards like Solemn to protect Future Fusion for 2 turns. It wasnt fast enough to be competitive like the old Chimeratech OTK which I still used as part of the deck. It's virtually always better to have a Cyber Dragon and a Cyber Twin Dragon together on the field than it is to have a lone Cyber End Dragon on the field.
Start new topic. Recommended Posts. Uchiha Posted September 6, Posted September 6, Thats Right. According to Sept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options
0コメント